From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6879: 24.0.50; Shouldn't word-wrap be safe as file local variable? Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:16:18 +0900 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282120838 30092 80.91.229.12 (18 Aug 2010 08:40:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6879-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 18 10:40:36 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OleCH-00084H-Ti for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:40:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50011 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OleCH-0004Zr-1n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:40:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38119 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OleAq-0003uh-2l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OleAo-0006dU-H0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48352) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OleAo-0006dJ-Ew for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OldoY-0000DM-Fg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:16:02 -0400 Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 6879 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 6879@debbugs.gnu.org, handa@m17n.org Original-Received: via spool by 6879-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D6879.1282119321793 (code D ref 6879); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6879-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Aug 2010 08:15:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oldnt-0000Ck-C0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:15:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oldnq-0000CZ-2d for 6879-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:15:19 -0400 Original-Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o7I8GJDr009753; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:16:19 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp2.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o7I8GJrf007511; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:16:19 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o7I8GJW1001444; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:16:19 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Oldop-0004fW-46; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:16:19 +0900 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:37:35 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:16:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:39608 Archived-At: In article , Stefan Monnier writes: > > Currently the variable word-wrap is not considered as safe > > when specified in Local Variables: section of a file. But, > > I see no risk in treating it as safe. How about this patch? > > It is for the trunk code, but perhaps it should go to > > emacs-23 branch too. > Yes, it's good for emacs-23, please install it, > thanks, Just done. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org