From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kelly Dean Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19479: Copyright issue Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 01:18:00 +0000 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1420852758 15802 80.91.229.3 (10 Jan 2015 01:19:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 01:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19479@debbugs.gnu.org, assign@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 10 02:19:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9khr-0004f2-Kl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 02:19:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52848 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9khq-00036F-O4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 20:19:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51300) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9khn-000367-8x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 20:19:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9khj-0005lc-7o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 20:19:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60158) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9khj-0005lH-5D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 20:19:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9khi-0003Lo-H2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 20:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kelly Dean Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 01:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19479 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: security Original-Received: via spool by 19479-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19479.142085273412864 (code B ref 19479); Sat, 10 Jan 2015 01:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19479) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2015 01:18:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41291 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9khZ-0003LP-Pu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 20:18:53 -0500 Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:55421) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9khX-0003LG-9d for 19479@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 20:18:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mfilter31-d.gandi.net (mfilter31-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.162]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74498172071; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 02:18:49 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter31-d.gandi.net X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "Cc" Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter31-d.gandi.net (mfilter31-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XLxwGi783N57; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 02:18:48 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 66.220.3.179 Original-Received: from localhost (gm179.geneticmail.com [66.220.3.179]) (Authenticated sender: kelly@prtime.org) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2004172080; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 02:18:46 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98157 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > All this arguing just to try and avoid signing the standard document > baffles me If I sign an assignment document, then I would be committing perjury. Possibly in the legal sense, and at least in the moral sense. And there isn't just one standard document. There are at least five; three for disclaimers, and two for assignments. I asked the clerk to choose the correct disclaimer for me. If he'd done it, none of this arguing would be necessary. All of which I already pointed out, so I'm baffled by your bafflement.