From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
To: 7969-done@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#7969: Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth' in ibuffer
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 02:03:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <smwrlhk3bn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvy65xyiic.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:12:23 -0500")
Version: 23.3
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Indeed, that looks like a likely trigger, but it's still a bug for
> ibuffer to inf-loop when faced with such data. Can you investigate to
> try and avoid the inf-loop?
Fixed.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-03 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-02 19:00 bug#7969: Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth' in ibuffer mxemacs
2011-02-02 23:53 ` Glenn Morris
2011-02-03 2:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-02-03 7:03 ` Glenn Morris [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=smwrlhk3bn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rgm@gnu.org \
--cc=7969-done@debbugs.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).