From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: "Charles A. Roelli" <charles@aurox.ch>, 28350@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#28350: enriched.el code execution
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 12:32:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sh8thlmc0p.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83wp57vmk6.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 09 Sep 2017 19:55:37 +0300")
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> At this point it seems that unsafe display specs are more the
>> exception than the rule, so it might make sense to define the
>> `enriched-display-prop-safe-p' function by excluding the unsafe
>> specifications instead of including the safe ones. What do you
>> think?
>
> I'm not sure. The display spec can be complex, so to make sure none
> of these exceptions sneak through, you will have to recursively unpack
> the spec data structure and examine each of the elements, which smells
> too similar to emulating 'eval'. No?
FWIW, there is 'unsafep'.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-11 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-04 19:24 bug#28350: enriched.el code execution Charles A. Roelli
2017-09-06 19:25 ` Charles A. Roelli
2017-09-07 2:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-09 12:23 ` Charles A. Roelli
2017-09-09 13:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-09 15:57 ` Charles A. Roelli
2017-09-09 16:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-09 20:37 ` Charles A. Roelli
2017-09-10 17:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-11 16:32 ` Glenn Morris [this message]
2017-09-11 17:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-09 22:43 ` Paul Eggert
2017-09-10 18:54 ` Charles A. Roelli
2017-09-10 21:46 ` Paul Eggert
2017-09-11 2:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-11 14:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-11 15:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-11 18:44 ` Charles A. Roelli
2017-09-11 19:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-16 9:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-11 15:33 ` Glenn Morris
2017-09-11 16:38 ` Paul Eggert
2017-09-11 21:16 ` Glenn Morris
2017-09-12 19:59 ` Paul Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sh8thlmc0p.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rgm@gnu.org \
--cc=28350@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=charles@aurox.ch \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).