From: Lute Kamstra <Lute.Kamstra@cwi.nl>
Subject: Re: take this famous emacs benchmark test
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:47:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sgdbrz66g09.fsf@occarina.pna.cwi.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.4683.1050451356.21513.bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> (Dan Jacobson's message of "Wed, 16 Apr 2003 05:05:12 +0800")
Dan Jacobson <jidanni@dman.ddts.net> writes:
> Fellas, take my nifto emacs benchmark test, which I pegged together
> just moments ago without proper computer training...
>
> j=;for i in '' -nw -q --no-site-file;do j=$i\ $j;c="time emacs $j -f
> kill-emacs";echo -e \\n\$ $c;$c;done
>
> ...to see just how much slower your emacs plods along due to your
> and your "Linux distribution" crud-encrusting it. Just cut and paste it
> into your shell to-day! Results here at Nerdsburg Laboratories:
>
> $ time emacs -f kill-emacs
> 0.97user 0.13system 0:01.30elapsed 84%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
> 0inputs+0outputs (1632major+952minor)pagefaults 0swaps
>
> $ time emacs -nw -f kill-emacs
> 0.80user 0.12system 0:00.93elapsed 98%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
> 0inputs+0outputs (1305major+823minor)pagefaults 0swaps
>
> $ time emacs -q -nw -f kill-emacs
> 0.44user 0.07system 0:00.53elapsed 96%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
> 0inputs+0outputs (1296major+675minor)pagefaults 0swaps
>
> $ time emacs --no-site-file -q -nw -f kill-emacs
> 0.07user 0.03system 0:00.09elapsed 105%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
> 0inputs+0outputs (1056major+311minor)pagefaults 0swaps
I'm curious. What happens when you do these four tests in reverse order?
[...]
Lute.
--
(spook) => "Skipjack 9705 Samford Road propaganda"
(insert-file-contents "~/.signature") => (error "`~/.signature' too rude")
next parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-16 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.4683.1050451356.21513.bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2003-04-16 7:47 ` Lute Kamstra [this message]
2003-04-16 20:38 ` take this famous emacs benchmark test Dan Jacobson
2003-04-16 22:53 ` Thomas A. Horsley
2003-04-15 21:05 Dan Jacobson
2003-04-16 10:58 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sgdbrz66g09.fsf@occarina.pna.cwi.nl \
--to=lute.kamstra@cwi.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).