From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Mike FABIAN Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences =?UTF-8?Q?don=E2=80=99t?= render correctly Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 17:59:25 +0100 Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: References: <83lfongp4p.fsf@gnu.org> <835zfrglu5.fsf@gnu.org> <83wo86g8pg.fsf@gnu.org> <83k146g46x.fsf@gnu.org> <83imjqg1iv.fsf@gnu.org> <837e06foof.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2sme617.fsf@gnu.org> <83k145emk9.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7z9ehla.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="40885"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, 39799@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 29 18:00:27 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j85TW-000AWq-Oz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:00:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34000 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j85TV-00005w-Cb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:00:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57865) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j85TA-0008VZ-Bl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:00:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j85T9-0005xg-2u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57559) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j85T8-0005xL-Vu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j85T8-0001XL-UR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mike FABIAN Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 17:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39799 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39799-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39799.15829955785840 (code B ref 39799); Sat, 29 Feb 2020 17:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39799) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Feb 2020 16:59:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35299 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j85Sk-0001W8-Ix for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:59:38 -0500 Original-Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:59638 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j85Sh-0001Vy-5x for 39799@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:59:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1582995574; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6frn41Vh2tNCDd2FHxxCbtjDc6Ryn3m/PUIZxsX60UY=; b=Q0ASBECKgCNHCsC06hUug/7dchFwfwVmOx7Jvgw+5AuJEofxTUOUZD1vfZqaPuPiUnp7BO 81wPS6sEV88KLIchvvHcxIC1oQLKEpzGh/BF1uNeDAQgAHoPgr/Z1fKoofaMqT5HycJmNt 1OgZc7lhknZDHt/fXfWl7MDDwx/4f94= Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-362-Z3F1mM9iNuWs17yD0QDLAA-1; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:59:29 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Z3F1mM9iNuWs17yD0QDLAA-1 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id n23so3084720wra.20 for <39799@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 08:59:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IXW/EzdPEUkH5u9XkwYiLu/fpGDA9/4QKyBFn+q/Ej0=; b=PS52NNxknma1bEvl3icDE4QgDeBgedGhkXcLj9hpI+YuCgPZYCrkCagAXhQfjEH6gV N+5MgBuqRjualgYuWiWav3nNxeV3Ws/9wEunskROZW/OCA4xNS3xvA9iYtJvXShzNuod qR4NaRsAAqosmsEY0Ftlqcb02siX9Si5MUOPhcEaz/IpOpciyfmjNcvzYS8t76/WlnH0 5X9vdQzniBW1Q+o9j+jQix4Rs3CHJXKhRBAlPHuIbc9RB2EZZ9eRohFvDPol6UOz56cS YBTKvtx3rN3iXbUFbyaDBBcDsfomfamCC9XgIm1BanXsyTVIprC2zZmjFc2hmdV5Ydq9 Na3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXO7qzXiYXa8NJM2DfoevUxN8WM1ZXpnNT9QHWOYCzljED21fCk MYj6T/gU0+ZrrZXzpTNUc+MHOuATWCdvqRCuyBKOGeWiclIWpVzbVYSSlqkkMPfRr/HGZ08CK5C kHOBkW+0eKsi/Sg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c7cf:: with SMTP id z15mr3004534wmk.25.1582995567913; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 08:59:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw8pZi3vFSlPDY/m4cJHwHjYh/HR+CYqQnxsLWwsYVBMa7unAUgGDDodLeuannO9c+ChD5+Dw== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c7cf:: with SMTP id z15mr3004519wmk.25.1582995567568; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 08:59:27 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from taka.site (ppp-46-244-214-115.dynamic.mnet-online.de. [46.244.214.115]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f195sm7125195wmf.17.2020.02.29.08.59.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 29 Feb 2020 08:59:27 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from taka.site (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by taka.site (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5EB900; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 17:59:25 +0100 (CET) X-Face: "'; oPz9V1+<,`}1ZuxRv~EiSusWq*{Yjr"Sdvbhq'?q=2R\\6Y9O/,SAE`{J|6I=|w/sQg< rW_N'E3IV6~f8?\l#Es`]S`mv',PY(`8{$$R?+gLu}Qv/Mn>)?uladFjJ@yl!_p_Jh; 5QxlD6zL:?r IXe4FfK$C^mWhh$o`yt; .r.FLZLQOWBt> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:52:17 +0200") X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:176678 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii =E3=81=95=E3=82=93=E3=81=AF=E3=81=8B=E3=81=8D= =E3=81=BE=E3=81=97=E3=81=9F: >> > And the resulting display is what you expect? If not, then I think >> > you need to find a font which supports Emoji presentation of >> > characters such as =E2=93=82, and make Emacs use it for those sequence= s. >>=20 >> Yes, in the case of =E2=93=82=EF=B8=8F U+24C2 U+FE0F the result in Emacs= is perfect >> when using =E2=80=9CNoto Color Emoji=E2=80=9D or =E2=80=9CJoypixels=E2= =80=9D. It is displayed in colour >> and behaves as a single character in the buffer, the variation selector >> is not displayed as a box. This is perfect. >>=20 >> But when using Symbola for the same sequence one sees U+FE0F as an ugly >> box. > > So we should augment our default fontsets to use Emoji-capable fonts > in preference to those, like Symbola, which aren't. And perhaps for > Emoji we should make the exception in the rule that we prefer the > default face's font, so that users will not need to tweak > use-default-font-for-symbols to have Emoji display with those capable > fonts. Patches to these effects are welcome. > >> But what about # U+0023 NUMBER SIGN ? >>=20 >> This does have an emoji representation. > > The question is how important is to be able to display that character > as an Emoji, in the context of the jobs that Emacs is mainly used > for. Maybe not too much. I agree, not very important at all. I am surprised why this exists at all as an emoji. >> How could this ever work in Emacs? If you have to decide for a single >> font to render U+0023 in Emacs, you would need to set a =E2=80=9Ccapable= =E2=80=9D emoji >> font for an ASCII character like #. One probably does not want to do >> that. > > If fonts like DejaVu Sans Mono and others, routinely used for > displaying fixed-pitch text (such as program source code) acquire the > capabilities of displaying Emoji, that is exactly what should be done. > As long as the current tendency of using Emoji everywhere continues, I > see no reason not to expect those fonts to be enhanced to support > Emoji. Yes, maybe that could be a long term solution. --=20 Mike FABIAN =E7=9D=A1=E7=9C=A0=E4=B8=8D=E8=B6=B3=E3=81=AF=E3=81=84=E3=81=84=E4=BB=95=E4= =BA=8B=E3=81=AE=E6=95=B5=E3=81=A0=E3=80=82