Eli Zaretskii さんはかきました: >> From: Mike FABIAN >> Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, 39799@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:41:02 +0100 >> >> > Q:What about applications that don't support variation sequences? >> > >> > A: Applications not supporting variation sequences should act as if the >> > variation selector is not present. That normally applies to all text >> > processes such as searching, sorting, parsing, and so forth. >> >> So probably Ⓜ︎ U+24C2 U+FE0E should not display U+FE0E as a box, as you >> say it should exactly display as just Ⓜ U+24C2. > > You can control this via glyphless-char-display. The thin 1-pixel > space is just the current default, and we could change that default if > we think it's better not to display the variation selectors at all. > It's just that the "Emacsy" way is not to conceal any characters from > the user, so the current default was chosen to follow that. I agree, not displaying anything at all is not so nice either. It is nicer if one can find something there when stepping over it and delete the U+FE0E, that is really more "Emacsy", I think. Like when I have “AA” (U+0041 U+FEFF U+0041) I can still move the cursor over that string and find that there is something between the two As, check what that is, delete it if I want ... So a thin 1-pixel space sounds good to me, it does not look ugly but one can still edit it. But currently I don’t seem to get a thin 1-pixel space for Ⓜ︎ U+24C2 U+FE0E I get a box with a 1 pixel border in the foreground colour (black) and this box has a total width of 6 pixels. See attached screenshot. This looks fairly ugly is a bit too much maybe. You get a 1-pixel space? Is special setup needed to get that or should I get that by default? -- Mike FABIAN