From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15947: DocView interferes with etc/enriched.doc Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:04:08 -0500 Message-ID: References: <7geh69boo8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5q38mp7gcl.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <874n74srys.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385139905 18529 80.91.229.3 (22 Nov 2013 17:05:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15947@debbugs.gnu.org To: Bastien Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 22 18:05:10 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VjuAH-0007ox-SQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:05:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40074 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VjuAH-0001bF-BR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:05:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47435) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VjuAC-0001as-Sz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VjuAB-0006oy-Q2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:05:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53205) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VjuAB-0006oi-NT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:05:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VjuAA-0000wy-U1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:05:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15947 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15947-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15947.13851398513554 (code B ref 15947); Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15947) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2013 17:04:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38989 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vju9L-0000vG-DZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:04:11 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:54345 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vju9I-0000v2-VJ for 15947@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:04:09 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vju9I-0000pM-5P; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:04:08 -0500 X-Spook: Reno North Korea SWAT csim halcon clandestine Rand X-Ran: e4gQ`*;3&&2[mOUmZ9MRZ4nq+^$Qm.l_}jbZy45^}\Ws/i|DCILCr1]I-^4+S>?Npg{dcw X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <874n74srys.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:31:23 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80863 Archived-At: Bastien wrote: > Using .doc as the extension is confusing to the user and to the > computer where those files may be (visually) associated with the > wrong program. Probably .doc is not a good extension these days. > Maybe we should simply use another extension? > > .ert (as Emacs Rich Text) I assume there was a reason why that wasn't done to start with. Enriched mode is a minor mode, not a major mode. I guess the idea is that you can use it with whatever major mode you prefer (though I guess it would always be text mode in practice). I think just using .txt for the example file would be better than making up a new extension. But it seems to me that it should work better than it does now even if you use a .doc extension.