From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17217: 24.4.50; eww/shr and relative links Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:52:36 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87zjjw3lcx.fsf@kitaj.lan> <871tpi7w16.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87h9ye6bpv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zjjw3lcx.fsf@kitaj.lan> <871tpi7w16.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87h9ye6bpv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d29267uw.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415206393 14917 80.91.229.3 (5 Nov 2014 16:53:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 16:53:13 +0000 (UTC) To: 17217@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 05 17:53:06 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm3pS-0002Ao-7n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 17:53:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47514 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm3pR-0003pd-Uf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:53:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47557) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm3pP-0003ov-Aa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:53:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm3pO-0002N5-Iq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:53:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53050) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm3pO-0002N0-G6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm3pO-0003Is-6E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:53:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17217 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17217-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17217.141520635812659 (code B ref 17217); Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17217) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2014 16:52:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50263 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm3p0-0003I5-5z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:52:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:36561) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm3oz-0003Hy-0T for 17217@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:52:37 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm3oy-000289-Kf; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:52:36 -0500 X-Spook: Kosovo UNSCOM Gazprom hackers TELINT Lexis-Nexis pink X-Ran: U*XeS2qpv7h]]BWixKz;)#*I<"uJhGUM%"+Oh-Dt7eU`{^8"%<@B<{%BfH8[0eGdj[k4Li X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87d29267uw.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:14:47 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:95547 Ted Zlatanov wrote: > I thought archiving applied to inactive bugs, not just closed ones. So I > unarchived thinking "it's been inactive." No, only closed bugs ever get archived (after one month with no comments). Open ones hang around for ever to haunt us...