From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1102: Modification of patch Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:54:49 -0400 Message-ID: References: <873aj9mvjd.fsf@hagelb.org> Reply-To: Glenn Morris , 1102@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224137419 22349 80.91.229.12 (16 Oct 2008 06:10:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1102@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Phil Hagelberg Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 16 08:11:19 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KqM4p-0005F3-Sm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:11:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56238 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KqM3k-0001ZQ-Oe for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:10:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KqM3f-0001XS-MZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KqM3e-0001WL-3h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55000 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KqM3e-0001WI-16 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:36660) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KqM3d-0002j5-Kz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:10:01 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m9G69x8U026926; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:09:59 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m9G655Ys025755; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:05:05 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:05:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1102 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1102-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1102.122413664523678 (code B ref 1102); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:05:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1102) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 16 Oct 2008 05:57:25 +0000 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m9G5vMpJ023672 for <1102@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:57:23 -0700 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KqLov-0006oN-3x; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:54:49 -0400 X-Spook: Crypto AG Albright Al Jazeera Honduras government X-Ran: g_[HT[&N8Ow9UCyMQ$z/zuMJp^*L~:"Zs`+@Z'YmJ4D4O=5%VxTgN7@SQ?G9!IN>3fPu?' X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:10:03 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:21531 Archived-At: Phil Hagelberg wrote: > add-hook should allow symbols since it's reasonable to refer to > functions that haven't been defined yet. Doesn't it therefore seem a bit pointless to check? There will always be ways to shoot oneself in the foot. I imagine many functions don't check the type of their arguments.