From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13445: add2rline usage in manual Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:40:39 -0500 Message-ID: References: <9wvcazxq6y.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <50FB1B48.3010008@cs.ucla.edu> <6hpq104xa3.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <50FB2334.3040703@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358638875 28436 80.91.229.3 (19 Jan 2013 23:41:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 23:41:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13445@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 20 00:41:33 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Twi2T-000432-Fw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 00:41:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46716 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Twi2C-0005SS-HS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:41:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49834) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Twi29-0005SC-UA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:41:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Twi28-0001K4-G6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:41:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35297) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Twi28-0001K0-D7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:41:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Twi30-0004aP-MW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 23:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13445 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13445-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13445.135863889817601 (code B ref 13445); Sat, 19 Jan 2013 23:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jan 2013 23:41:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40761 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Twi2c-0004Zo-1k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:41:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:44370) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Twi2a-0004Zh-0J for 13445@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:41:36 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Twi1g-000863-4R; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:40:40 -0500 X-Spook: CIA Rule Psix genetic national information infrastructure X-Ran: 8*5x=R1hm+Gnthl4G^5zu7~O+W?b).-x`02GX0]E:;DlIB>+ssF.xV|@xoXjXXHt}B%DnT X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <50FB2334.3040703@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Sat, 19 Jan 2013 14:50:28 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70067 Archived-At: Paul Eggert wrote: > Sorry, that was my problem -- I didn't see the footnote. (Do people > read footnotes?...) I think you answered your own question. :)