From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:44:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341560715 15065 80.91.229.3 (6 Jul 2012 07:45:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 07:45:15 +0000 (UTC) To: 11707@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 06 09:45:15 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sn3E2-00077v-Dv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 09:45:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32898 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sn3E1-0004a4-EH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:45:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56149) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sn3Dv-0004SL-4Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:45:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sn3Dt-00064I-ER for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:45:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41835) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sn3Dt-00062r-B4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:45:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sn3If-0004AJ-OZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:50:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 07:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11707 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11707-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11707.134156095515954 (code B ref 11707); Fri, 06 Jul 2012 07:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jul 2012 07:49:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51381 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sn3Hv-00049G-2b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:49:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:53573) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sn3Ht-00049A-Iw for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:49:14 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sn3D5-0001Sy-4o; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:44:15 -0400 X-Spook: Centro government Agfa Watergate Abbas FBI mailbomb X-Ran: aDW}!{Qii"aBj~8h=a,)8G<7=5\,a3Pr(a5An6w1e4|iKXvh!34a;.FIdN|A4DF+V\ql8B X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:35:40 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:61640 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > I don't think we should remove it, but we should definitely rename it > because nothing in "compile -vs- recompile" hints at the difference. > > We could rename it to "single-process-compile" or something like that. Done. This MS Windows bug is still open; maybe it can be closed, I don't know.