From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ken Olum Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4258: Your Emacs contributions Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:30:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200908251936.10632.marcooliva@sapo.pt> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409149894 29482 80.91.229.3 (27 Aug 2014 14:31:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 4258@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 27 16:31:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XMeFr-0007HT-H7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:31:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59959 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMeFq-0002Es-Ro for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:31:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMeFi-0002Df-7n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:31:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMeFa-00018L-Jq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:31:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46777) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMeFa-00018G-Gr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XMeFa-0002Qq-4Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ken Olum Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 4258 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 4258-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B4258.14091498139286 (code B ref 4258); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4258) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2014 14:30:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53720 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XMeEl-0002Pg-EN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: from cosmos.phy.tufts.edu ([130.64.83.16]:35385) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XMeEi-0002PX-5W for 4258@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:30:08 -0400 Original-Received: from kdo by cosmos.phy.tufts.edu ([local]:local) with local id 1XMeEg-0003E1-Tz - Using Exim-4.80.1 (MandrivaLinux) MTA (return-path ); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:30:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83wq9vjdiq.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:45:33 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92714 Archived-At: From: Eli Zaretskii Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:45:33 +0300 ...when a mail has both a text and an HTML form, is there any way to show HTML in preference to text, rather than the other way around? I think HTML should be the default with this patch installed. Not at the moment, but I agree there should be. Sometimes you get messages with text segments that say "go read the html instead" and even when the text is a converted copy of the HTML it is often inferior to what you could get by rendering it yourself. On the other hand, this seems like it should be a user preference, so how about a switch rmail-mime-prefer-html? Would you like a second patch to add this functionality or a new patch including what I sent before with this enhancement? Ken