From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16650: url-cookie-list - confirm, or undoable, deletion Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:49:57 -0500 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391586664 28147 80.91.229.3 (5 Feb 2014 07:51:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:51:04 +0000 (UTC) To: 16650@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 05 08:51:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WAxGI-0002nQ-5g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:51:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57817 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAxGH-0002K7-So for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:51:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59727) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAxGF-0002Jr-20 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:51:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAxGA-0005qg-I7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:51:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36069) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAxGA-0005qb-EL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WAxG9-0002eQ-Pd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 07:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 16650 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.139158660310112 (code B ref -1); Wed, 05 Feb 2014 07:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2014 07:50:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50088 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WAxFB-0002cl-KU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:53011) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WAxF8-0002cV-Ft for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:49:58 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAxF7-00049x-GC; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:49:57 -0500 X-Spook: Elvis Roswell MP5K-SD Glock Mafia Majic Aldergrove Islam X-Ran: LxCDQ=3Z%^\,^kMt<+_t\>SKF@gA}{>F`9~RBJhM!29/`c|WY~!5B8V:R?}$Y]o7'$gJw5 X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84599 Archived-At: Package: emacs Version: 24.3.50 Severity: wishlist In the M-x url-cookie-list buffer, it seems that url-cookie-delete delets cookies instantly with no confirmation. Maybe it would be nice if the operation was undoable? Of if there was optional confirmation? Or if one could mark a bunch of cookies, then there was a single expunge operation that asked for confirmation? Just some thoughts, obviously it's not very important.