From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Geoff Kuenning Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27923: 24.3; -iconic switch screws up geometry Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 15:20:25 -0800 Message-ID: References: <5995604A.3050605@gmx.at> <59980B16.1020307@gmx.at> <5A0D54A1.3020307@gmx.at> <5A0D5A5E.4080405@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510874475 20599 195.159.176.226 (16 Nov 2017 23:21:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 23:21:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: 27923@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 17 00:21:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eFTT0-0004qe-UM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:21:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43230 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFTT8-0002fv-7G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:21:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFTT1-0002ff-Pc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:21:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFTSw-00089G-O4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:21:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35331) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFTSw-000891-KR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eFTSw-0000OS-Em for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:21:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Geoff Kuenning Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 23:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27923 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27923-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27923.15108744281446 (code B ref 27923); Thu, 16 Nov 2017 23:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27923) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2017 23:20:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44011 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eFTSO-0000NG-EM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:20:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mallet.cs.hmc.edu ([134.173.42.59]:49104) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eFTSM-0000N8-8q for 27923@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:20:26 -0500 Original-Received: from bow.cs.hmc.edu (bow-vpn.cs.hmc.edu [10.81.251.5]) by mallet.cs.hmc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D9BDC15FC; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 15:20:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bow.cs.hmc.edu (Postfix, from userid 13409) id 91BBB6EA0987; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 15:20:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5A0D5A5E.4080405@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:29:02 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:139976 Archived-At: One other thing: I just checked the actual width of my frame by typing 80 characters, and it's 80 characters even though xwininfo is reporting 79. So I think this is either an actual xwininfo bug, or a minor interaction between emacs and X that causes the character size of a pixel window to be seen slightly incorrectly. >>> Do you mean that both sizes are off by one - 80/79 and 78/77 ? >>> What do >> >> Yes, the size should be 80x78 and instead comes up as >> 79x77. Weird, huh? > > There might be some snafu with how to count in toolbar, menubar > and > scrollbar. > >>> M-: (frame-width) RET >>> >>> and >>> >>> M-: (frame-height) >> >> I'll try to remember to try those tomorrow. > > Please do that. It will tell us what Emacs thinks about the > "realized" > size. > > martin > -- Geoff Kuenning geoff@cs.hmc.edu http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~geoff/ The P in "PDF" is a lie.