From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11103: 24.0.94; (error "Can't activate input method `dev-aiba'") Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:07:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <81bonhlvhv.fsf@gmail.com> <0eehsdkcb1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <811uo9rwd3.fsf@gmail.com> <817gy0inc1.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1333224551 29410 80.91.229.3 (31 Mar 2012 20:09:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:09:11 +0000 (UTC) To: 11103-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 31 22:09:05 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SE4bd-00032K-OJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:09:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60081 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SE4bd-0000Q8-25 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:09:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33765) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SE4bZ-0000JZ-Vo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:08:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SE4bY-0007LX-Bp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:08:57 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36731) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SE4bY-0007LM-93 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:08:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SE4be-0004zY-5q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:09:02 -0400 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 11103 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 11103@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 11103-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D11103.133322449019128 (code D ref 11103); Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11103-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2012 20:08:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33268 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SE4ao-0004yT-98 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:08:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:60494) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SE4ak-0004yL-LR for 11103-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:08:08 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SE4ad-0002lG-Gl; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:07:59 -0400 X-Spook: quarter digicash lock picking interception Fortezza X-Ran: /T%EVc<}UhFR)dq-IzQiK~Mq3-~z~rTp`L-;d?95k'~r`od4NXv4.lcrC;zCrqt}f!J:f~ X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <817gy0inc1.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Sun, 01 Apr 2012 00:56:22 +0530") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58408 Archived-At: Version: 24.0.95 Fair enough, I checked it in. If you think there should be actual changes to the input method, I suggest making a new report with the details. Followup to this report if there turns out to be some problem with the fix for the input method not working at all.