From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2912: 23.0.92; Ediff over TRAMP too slow Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:29:26 +0200 Message-ID: References: <18584843-972F-4F9C-84FF-A9E621BD39CF@boostpro.com> Reply-To: Michael Albinus , 2912@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1239111918 18046 80.91.229.12 (7 Apr 2009 13:45:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2912@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: David Abrahams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 07 15:46:36 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LrBdJ-0007Cf-OI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:46:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41727 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LrBbv-0003nQ-G7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:45:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LrBal-0003MZ-Hk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:43:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LrBah-0003Lp-My for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:43:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33045 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LrBah-0003Lc-9n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:43:51 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:51045) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LrBag-0006Ds-Mp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:43:50 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n37DhmPD006277; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 06:43:48 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n37DZ4a1003584; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 06:35:04 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Michael Albinus Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:35:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2912 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2912-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2912.12391109812012 (code B ref 2912); Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:35:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2912) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 7 Apr 2009 13:29:41 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from mailrelay2.alcatel.de (mailrelay2.alcatel.de [194.113.59.96]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n37DTbDQ002006 for <2912@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 06:29:39 -0700 Original-Received: from slbhn1.alcatel.de ([149.204.90.35]) by mailrelay2.alcatel.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/ICT) with ESMTP id n37DTSrE028332; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:29:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <18584843-972F-4F9C-84FF-A9E621BD39CF@boostpro.com> (David Abrahams's message of "Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:17:22 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 149.204.45.73 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:43:55 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:26970 Archived-At: David Abrahams writes: > I don't think that would be a big win. There is, however, a lot to be > gained somewhere *during* the ediff session. As I said, I'm not familiar with ediff. But there might also be another reason for network activity. If the files are under vc control, a lot of checks are always performed silently. You won't see the checks for local files, because they are fast enough. But for remote files it matters. If you know, that your files are *not* under vc control, you might apply (setq vc-handled-backends nil) Best regards, Michael.