From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47590: 28.0.50; dired-x.el: recommend 'bsdtar -xf' instead of proprietary 'unrar' program Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 20:20:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86a6qejuq6.fsf@protected.rcdrun.com> <831rbqe2ii.fsf@gnu.org> <874kglg6lq.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1866"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) Cc: 47590@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 05 02:21:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lTCzX-0000M0-UP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 02:21:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40330 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTCzW-0005ZH-SR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 20:21:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTCzG-0005Yn-0L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 20:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53346) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTCzF-0006AK-Px for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 20:21:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lTCzF-0007VO-Kl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 20:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 00:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47590 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 47590-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47590.161758204528820 (code B ref 47590); Mon, 05 Apr 2021 00:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47590) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2021 00:20:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36659 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lTCyy-0007Ul-UR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 20:20:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42740) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lTCys-0007UU-Ng for 47590@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 20:20:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48344) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTCyn-0005tr-Ck; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 20:20:33 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lTCym-0005dl-ND; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 20:20:32 -0400 X-Spook: Mena NAVWCWPNS Red Cross MD5 CQB undercover LLC [Hello to X-Ran: #?[QKp+_n4+O[wV~~^Q%q}d3*?kki?*lT2ZBy"p`K;<39=#11rR;Oh\\6<*F/Ig(*^enO8 X-Hue: brightgreen X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <874kglg6lq.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 04 Apr 2021 22:03:29 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203576 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > So I agree that there's nothing to fix here, and I'm closing this bug > report. Fair enough, but it's confusing that you then 1) tag it "fixed" (rather than notabug,wontfix) 2) mark it "fixed in Emacs 28.1" when nothing has changed in Emacs. I think I've noticed this a few other times as well.