From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1102: add-hook should check that its function arg is a function Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:46:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <873aj9mvjd.fsf@hagelb.org> <87hc7ciksj.fsf@hagelb.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310237259 16430 80.91.229.12 (9 Jul 2011 18:47:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 18:47:39 +0000 (UTC) To: 1102-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 09 20:47:32 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcYt-0000zs-Nz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 20:47:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47678 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcYs-00069Y-CE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:47:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54274) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcYU-00068L-Aq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:47:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcYR-0007GM-PZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:47:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55101) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcYR-0007GF-0H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcYQ-0000t4-Mw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:47:02 -0400 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 1102 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Mail-Followup-To: 1102@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 1102-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D1102.13102372043383 (code D ref 1102); Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1102-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2011 18:46:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcY7-0000sW-Eh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:46:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcY4-0000sI-1E for 1102-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:46:40 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36639) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcXy-0006Ul-Ie; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:46:34 -0400 X-Spook: Glock Afghanistan spies CDMA Watergate Sundevil Commecen X-Ran: H'fMFDQ8o+vfAdu^DF<]?6jgL^H$~V(5yVNw7^\^:MbK9W7lGGXcNqi4me243kXZ{uAD|y X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87hc7ciksj.fsf@hagelb.org> (Phil Hagelberg's message of "Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:09:32 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:47:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48353 Archived-At: I don't see a need to keep open this particular report, which was marked "wontfix" some time ago. Phil Hagelberg wrote: > Yeah, you're probably right; in retrospect I'm not sure why it's > necessary. Feel free to close as a wontfix.