From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:34:39 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340904900 28711 80.91.229.3 (28 Jun 2012 17:35:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11707@debbugs.gnu.org, Kazuhiro Ito To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 28 19:34:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIcJ-0007BX-Ak for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:34:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41038 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIcJ-0001gm-3i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:34:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38208) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIcF-0001gP-Lp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:34:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIcD-0008Lo-Qk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:34:51 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIcD-0008Lg-NB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:34:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIgI-0001Af-AV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:39:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11707 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11707-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11707.13409051364488 (code B ref 11707); Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2012 17:38:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35559 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIgC-0001AL-Bv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:38:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:55779) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIgA-0001AE-3Z for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:38:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIc3-0006vJ-Jd; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:34:39 -0400 X-Spook: SSL NSA Chobetsu Agfa UMTS beanpole SWAT Ft. Meade X-Ran: +Xrlu!{lW=bu}.fsR(d3;]Wy#/.jKQf%r`#4&U=lg%"!g_whpC=1H!6%hrw7F/Z*B@%"83 X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:35:40 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:61380 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > Actually, I don't know of any case where it ends up generating incorrect > byte-code. It will signal different (fewer) warnings and things like > that, but AFAIK the generated byte-code should be pretty much > equivalent. True. Though there's the "invalid byte code" issue with byte-compile-dynamic that was noticed recently. That's an extra, somewhat serious looking warning that it signals.