From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13505: Bug#696026: emacs24: file corruption on saving Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:24:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20121215223809.GA7549@xvii.vinc17.org> <877gn8ijgn.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <83obgjpzod.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358713505 5689 80.91.229.3 (20 Jan 2013 20:25:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13505@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 20 21:25:23 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx1SF-0001c6-8s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:25:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45853 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx1Ry-0004DS-Al for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:25:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx1Rv-0004Bv-Tq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:25:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx1Ru-00050i-MJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:25:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36385) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx1Ru-00050B-Ir for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx1Sr-00028v-Ri for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:26:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13505 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13505-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13505.13587135168182 (code B ref 13505); Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13505) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2013 20:25:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41849 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx1S8-00027u-Ks for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:25:16 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:57867) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx1S6-00027m-4z for 13505@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:25:14 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx1R7-0004DR-FN; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:24:13 -0500 X-Spook: nuclear FBI Saudi Arabia Treasury red noise Firefly Rubin X-Ran: 53V4'0W:>=w<8Hvq[j8wa$_xKQWRDpLIg<2?;,`x;N8a{w7QT~!Y_8jL[w{O/AgD_#`|Aa X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <83obgjpzod.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:49:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70100 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Personally, I don't think there's a bug here. It's a cockpit error. Does this also apply to http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13377 I already marked that important, forwarded it, and suggested it was related to the original Debian report in this issue, but have received no response. Please follow up to 13377 if you have any info.