From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13411: 24.2.91; Sorting in Buffer Menu Mode Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:53:22 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359575676 12604 80.91.229.3 (30 Jan 2013 19:54:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13411@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Aaron S. Hawley" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 30 20:54:55 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U0dk6-0005N5-Ni for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:54:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52326 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0djo-0004Qn-RK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:54:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54431) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0djl-0004QT-FQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:54:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0djk-0000Qe-Gs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:54:25 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50773) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0djk-0000QZ-Db for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:54:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U0dkM-0001Sn-4L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:55:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13411 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13411-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13411.13595756435551 (code B ref 13411); Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13411) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2013 19:54:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56237 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U0djO-0001RU-WE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:54:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:54281) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U0djN-0001Qz-Gw for 13411@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:54:01 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0dik-0000FE-Sq; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:53:22 -0500 X-Spook: world domination global insurgency Freeh AIMSX credit X-Ran: [kb{TLQa(*Mx`$&^K/2}]_~?IPqEW7s?ALY:tF;|.[xQK/^]{QUkdAvdl$B8=-sztG8uE| X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70498 Archived-At: "Aaron S. Hawley" wrote: > How do I disable sorting so that it goes back to the default order of > buffer-list? This is a tabulated list mode issue. Maybe you can just (setq tabulated-list-sort-key nil); followed by g. There's no UI for that at present AFAICS. If the list of items is slow to generate, it may be better to cached the original order and restore it. > Maybe it could with the M-0 argument since it's not being used. Or > maybe a M-- argument since negative columns don't exist? Although, > with 7 columns to remember now, maybe sorting the second to last > column with M-- M-2 should be available. Maybe 0 S is a good suggestion.