From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21104: 25.0.50; relative paths are added to load-path without -nsl (bug#21104) Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:06:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83mvtmcau2.fsf@gnu.org> <9aoae1wx8m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83h9jtc4eo.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449594447 13323 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2015 17:07:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 17:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: esq@lawlist.com, andlind@gmail.com, 21104@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 08 18:07:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a6LjL-00073e-TS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:07:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60918 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6LjL-0005kJ-AD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:07:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59955) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6LjF-0005gv-S8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:07:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6LjC-0001S6-VL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:07:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53729) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6LjC-0001Ru-Rq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a6LjC-00080T-Fd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:07:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21104 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21104-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21104.144959437630711 (code B ref 21104); Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21104) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2015 17:06:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43437 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a6LiR-0007zH-RE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:06:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49622) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a6LiP-0007z6-Im for 21104@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:06:14 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Original-Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC99BAAC1; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 17:06:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Yow: Yow! I'm UNEMPLOYED! In-Reply-To: <83h9jtc4eo.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:05:03 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109769 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > (Does anyone know why we call decode_env_path with last argument zero > in this case? I don't see how that could make any sense here.) In which way does that make a difference? Both "." and nil mean the same thing, namely default-directory. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."