From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16254: 24.3.50; [PATCH] bzr error on emacs trunk using vc-print-log Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:41:34 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87d2kk4zcn.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388428926 7836 80.91.229.3 (30 Dec 2013 18:42:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 18:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16254@debbugs.gnu.org To: Christoph Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 30 19:42:12 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vxhn1-0000wt-FW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 19:42:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59412 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vxhn0-0005dh-QM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:42:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51496) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vxhmx-0005dP-4e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:42:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vxhms-0007xr-GK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:42:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39015) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vxhms-0007xV-DJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:42:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vxhms-0004kW-1g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 18:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16254 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16254-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16254.138842889718207 (code B ref 16254); Mon, 30 Dec 2013 18:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16254) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2013 18:41:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53034 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VxhmS-0004ja-Mu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:41:36 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:35247) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VxhmQ-0004jS-RV for 16254@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:41:35 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VxhmQ-0004ma-5y; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:41:34 -0500 X-Spook: BROMURE Juiliett Class Submarine quiche Bletchley Park X-Ran: *:}|n4IkA+5f]nR/v}fCvJssZdfG1V!?.k:JfQ,pDU"P4uk,Rn(|.Jt~pDQ&zx1a{Phr}0 X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Christoph's message of "Mon, 30 Dec 2013 08:53:39 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82761 Archived-At: Christoph wrote: > It would be nice if a fix for this issue made it into 24.4. Or do you think > that this is too intrusive of a change? 24.4 is still some way off. BTW, it does not work correctly in 23.4 or 24.1, so it does not seem that urgent to me. It works fine from a vc-dir buffer, just not a dired buffer.