From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1092: compilation-goto-error goes to wrong location when buffer has hidden regions Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:00:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <48E90990.1020101@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310234493 1765 80.91.229.12 (9 Jul 2011 18:01:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 18:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1092@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 09 20:01:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfbqI-0002sb-Jo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 20:01:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59433 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfbqH-0001LO-O5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:01:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfbpx-0001Kp-3C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:01:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfbpv-0007wD-Ik for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:01:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfbpv-0007w1-1l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:01:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfbpu-0007L1-8U; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 1092 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 1092-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B1092.131023441625740 (code B ref 1092); Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1092) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2011 18:00:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfbp9-0006h7-II for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:00:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfbp7-0006Yy-Te for 1092@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:00:14 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45967) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfbp1-0003uc-NA; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:00:07 -0400 X-Spook: United Nations bce NORAD enemy of the state S Key Janet X-Ran: i~yR&fpY9;}Lzm[[V4x!MmtYI5(nvWqwoyshb_|f.l\9:(%U-]LA|g:AJ]k[f2b_8ocr3[ X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:50:14 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:01:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48346 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > For what it's worth, I'd recommend you fix this problem by not using > selective-display (replace it with an overlay). Should `selective-display' be marked as obsolete? (I kind of thought it was, but it does not seem to be.) Can it do anything that other methods of making regions invisible cannot?