From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9243: 24.0.50; Gnus keeps seeing 101 unread spam Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:38:50 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325893182 14366 80.91.229.12 (6 Jan 2012 23:39:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9243@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 07 00:39:37 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RjJNn-0002KP-Hz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:39:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47421 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjJNm-0001HQ-RM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:39:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33407) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjJNi-0001H4-7c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:39:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjJNe-0008OL-7y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:39:30 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39576) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjJNe-0008OH-5F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:39:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RjJR8-0007xH-5S; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:43:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9243 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9243-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9243.132589336130550 (code B ref 9243); Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9243) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2012 23:42:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RjJQn-0007wh-3l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:42:41 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RjJQk-0007wZ-7a for 9243@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:42:38 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RjJN5-0006qC-JF; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:38:51 +0100 X-Now-Playing: Various's _Bossa Jazz (2)_: "Luis Carlos Vinhas - Batucada" In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:53:33 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1RjJN5-0006qC-JF MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1326497931.86965@uPkiKgX8Udp8yJ1dzOpMfA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:43:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55448 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: >> The Agent is indispensable for nnimap (unless you use offlineimap that >> is), and while I do see a few problems with nnimap (which may all come >> from the Agent), it's mostly usable, so I think it's worth the trouble >> trying to make it work (and enable it by default). > > Yes, of course. I just haven't quite worked up the nerve to go delving > into that code again, but I'm steeling myself, and will get to it one of > these weekends. I've started looking into this now -- I've enabled the Agent for my main IMAP server and stuff. But I haven't seen any bugs yet. Is there anything in particular one does to make the Agent misbehave? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/