From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36591: 26.2; Term's pager seems broken Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 19:44:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87lfwox3fi.fsf@gmail.com> <838ssops2u.fsf@gnu.org> <87imrsw5gj.fsf@gmail.com> <83y30no4hi.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftmvvsol.fsf@gmail.com> <875znqctzy.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87a7d2w9mj.fsf@gmail.com> <85h87aja6e.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="180830"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: abliss@gmail.com, 36591@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 25 19:45:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hqhnj-000ksS-7o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 19:45:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34532 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqhnh-0007lz-Es for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:45:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqhne-0007ls-Er for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:45:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqhna-0004ZK-Rk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:45:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqhna-0004Yl-NG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqhna-0004jJ-Hu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 17:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36591 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36591-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36591.156407666518108 (code B ref 36591); Thu, 25 Jul 2019 17:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36591) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jul 2019 17:44:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40411 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqhmy-0004i0-KY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:44:24 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:47366) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqhmu-0004hq-RN for 36591@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:44:23 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hqhmp-0006gh-Dv; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 19:44:19 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEXEvr0jISsREBtVUlcI CBKHhIc+O0JgYGOkoKKxra6SPbW5AAACRklEQVQ4jVWUPW/bMBCGuaS1x2MMdiYhZHeE0HMN/oHA oOQxjNAzuiUQLKGbi8KwvAko0tj/tkeRtOWbqPfhe8evE2vbcxfj7CMMD5a17TrqR5JPcVxoAnY0 P5I9EqjXIz2SP4gJHBMYijSVi8ArPZv2gRxQR4efz3xMB9JgSpV0ChpShQiOPk+M6anECxjp7KDd GFzmrzDo7gr21pZtiwgOcwiOowcf3UcNfCkFOa6gZ/bY1Q5AOKVEquEzffq0FRHEBoSoXAJN1Wr+ 3ZFDtxpEFR39HT71BRcI0GxtjcDBAyrxd7PbfUL+NAex6cocgJsADltar9Rvv4XQ21KTEyJod4wB vH0RmK/cHGQE5zL/1U+42Db3m/Wp4FKCG8C01IsfBObZt58T9pVLJSEBRN3kXOGL7Uq+TDXObY26 XrxL7sRi0SiTapCj0oVf5FLSCfBlZrJYnFK5TEoCtHmujDHhSAhoZwxwycnnde/o+r7NcyQgOCWH V54A64tNDWjMvVJZhm5mzFIN4PzPX5xRDxntwFuNieCOboJnRs4kHTEfAfZM2ZURjw/OgddTKjoG WqbUTjoyej0BthouerbkQVY8ACIHDBtTIQawG97VdF/nC7p12uDIkZ7i3RwgkGHn0+sbncz9kQSw Zqfrq6bH7rK4qjWbXPqAzKfiAvpJaEEWenD/SMAXt2wy6k3q2hXPBocHF+K7eV/OvSO3lOrmh2Ht syOgbd/dhLV2JQdg7fpWtxYiuKL98GXfX1mta8Qqp2ivsS3cf0H6gIg6x/rGAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC In-Reply-To: <85h87aja6e.fsf@gmail.com> (Noam Postavsky's message of "Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:28:25 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:163729 Archived-At: Noam Postavsky writes: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > >>> Do you think the reversed check in set_process_filter_masks could cause >>> bugs for sockets too then? >> >> Do you mean Unix domain socket? Hm... I don't think I follow... > > Not specifically, it's just that set_process_filter_masks is called in > two places, connect_network_socket and Fset_process_filter. We're only > fixing the latter (in the release branch at least), so I was wondering > whether there could be problems stemming from the connect_network_socket > call. Oh, right. Hm... the problem was really when you call `set-process-filter' more than once? I do not think connect_network_socket is called more than once per process... so I don't think it should be a problem? But the logic is rather difficult to follow. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no