From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1477: 23.0.60; Customize "not marked HIDDEN" is unclear Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 23:58:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <001701c954d6$30970d30$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310335241 32572 80.91.229.12 (10 Jul 2011 22:00:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1477@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 11 00:00:32 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg23B-0002kg-UB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53618 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg23A-0001mt-Pr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:00:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51109) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg22p-0001jz-Gs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg22n-0001vY-Kx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:00:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg22n-0001uX-BM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:00:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg22m-0000Ak-2F; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:00:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:00:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 1477 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 1477-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B1477.1310335144563 (code B ref 1477); Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:00:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1477) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jul 2011 21:59:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg21n-000092-2p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:59:03 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg21l-00008Y-Dp for 1477@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=quimbies.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg21a-00079P-5n; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 23:58:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:50:51 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAADFBMVEW6sKJ3VzyUhG+Gclm2 JondAAACO0lEQVQokUWSv0sbYRjHv6S0RPvDqQ6dRGiRWGuXLgWXjp09gw3x0jWBZgrRpLn3SJYQ wUxCKSohYI1v8E4KifUkOcF/oC3Eo4YmwUW8VK+UnmcuXN6mtrSf5Xk+05eH5wsR/7iG+f/igp68 Gn+FFgpjHvogJ4qD4M8lSqkuKblcEjxjXSpnbDmTF8ETtqfQcaEoKRSszYpta4v0aFWByzAVueZE NfveB6CqtSt+M+rvUQU57Bwyk+caUqvQz8prpOxNkHbrIUR3qi44QmReH6OIZeUFzk8TAaoHwUdW XxqhRWd79DiE2V55ZNizlP/sLtzEXPMHVqQyPVpsDSFW7ai9s6DdoEoFAivVzBN2IRw3+qKumRHT O3NgxZsg6/c7JsdNT2q/xSyZnL+mNb0LKoTNqdNlJvP9uywEUqXnlUPH64tbGoJBIz1RS/ijX1QZ ibBwZ6C7W/9GbRW8PXZD3jztLIbsHeiPPamT3WebWdKTkYTrLCTk38tRu4J9TCRYVAlMmS4HIkrE 6LBXn9bdJ9gXWdHac1j86SOCg9GLLerb8XeXhqLg136i2zS+ljeKEZDDwsj4zOrAu+G6g7C07clM U2Tas6eYU7+v56XMIDX4I/iWjyWdZtukaRqIWS9sKhXVRpJdQmea42wY6kewMKgiyOd1QVlBkcKN HtWFqvjm6vvjb5nqXLqvdg9lJtHP/7RGTE+aWtwI3Lo+ScAkmtKIY6Uhe8Fi6bs8z0V8mS4Hjmvd 5l4/qXF9fgFh5EUXfJ5UMgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Stephen O'Malley & Atsuo's _Uroborus Cricuit_: "(untitled)" X-Hashcash: 1:23:110710:1477@debbugs.gnu.org::NV32/RzVMaMrE6FN:000000000000000000000000000000000000000005ZFc X-Hashcash: 1:23:110710:drew.adams@oracle.com::RDvUZyN2Jq6v21iG:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000pN9r X-MailScanner-ID: 1Qg21a-00079P-5n MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1310939930.24939@HLay3mMIa66qi4YKp8Z4sg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:00:04 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48517 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > It should have simply been closed, which records it as a _bug_ that > has been _fixed_. It should not have been recorded as `notabug'. I thought "fixed" was if it was fixed as a result of the bug report, and "notabug" was if it turned out (when investigated) that the report reported something that wasn't a bug (ever or still). Perhaps we need a third flag, like "probablyabugatthetimeitwasreportedbutnotabugwhensomeonelookedatthebugreport"? Or perhaps just close it without a flag. Opinions? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/