From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11404: 24.1.50; gnus-summary: "Hiding the thread moved us backwards, aborting!" impedes workflow Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:18:23 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339363177 8468 80.91.229.3 (10 Jun 2012 21:19:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:19:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11404@debbugs.gnu.org To: Detlev Zundel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 10 23:19:36 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SdpXq-0003PP-W6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:19:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48307 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdpXq-0006i1-MM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:19:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40957) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdpXo-0006hv-HV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:19:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdpXm-000834-Lc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:19:32 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55732) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdpXm-00082z-Ib for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:19:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SdpaE-0000Xl-DO; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11404 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11404-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11404.13393632732031 (code B ref 11404); Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11404) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2012 21:21:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37044 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SdpZQ-0000Wi-It for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:46485) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SdpZH-0000WS-Po for 11404@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:21:10 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SdpWh-0001MQ-IW; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:18:23 +0200 X-Now-Playing: Pet Shop Boys's _Format (1)_: "Casting a shadow" In-Reply-To: (Detlev Zundel's message of "Fri, 04 May 2012 12:58:47 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1SdpWh-0001MQ-IW MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1339967903.92154@QNJQnnE6109WbI1XJhpY5w X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:60851 Archived-At: Detlev Zundel writes: > This workflow used to work perfectly fine until some time ago when the > 'gnus-summary-kill-thread' command started to throw the message "Hiding > the thread moved us backwards, aborting!" and left me at the _bottom_ of > the summary. Hm. Do you have `gnus-thread-hide-killed' set? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/