From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17625: 24.4.50; All installed packages marked "unsigned", no archive listed Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 16:28:47 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87tx89ffax.fsf@pellet.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <2vvbsnrgpk.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1403767754 8661 80.91.229.3 (26 Jun 2014 07:29:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 07:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17625@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 26 09:29:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X047I-00084R-Vw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:29:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42780 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X047I-0004Hr-A9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 03:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X047D-0004F0-IU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 03:29:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X047C-0005fk-MV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 03:29:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41759) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X047C-0005fg-JK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 03:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X047C-0005Wp-2D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 03:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daiki Ueno Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 07:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17625 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17625-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17625.140376773621233 (code B ref 17625); Thu, 26 Jun 2014 07:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17625) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2014 07:28:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32909 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0475-0005WN-KD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 03:28:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:44771 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0472-0005W9-C5 for 17625@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 03:28:53 -0400 Original-Received: from du-a.org ([2001:e41:db5e:fb14::1]:33856 helo=localhost.localdomain) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0471-0006Uu-Dx; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 03:28:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:39:36 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90833 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I have the impression you might have missed this bug-report, could you > take a look at it? Yes, thanks for noticing. > There are several issues in it: > > 1- why have `package-desc-signed' (and the foo.signed files)? I don't > think APT has such a feature and I'm wondering what would be > the interest. I remember it was exactly for displaying signed/unsigned status on the list, requested by Ted: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-10/msg00033.html I'm not sure if it is useful at this point. > In any case given that all packages installed so far are not > signed, the `list-packages' currently shouldn't scream "unsigned" > since it's the normal expected case. Makes sense. > 2- Could you fix package--check-signature so that we don't signal an > error when we `allow-unsigned' and there's a signature, but the > signature just can't be checked for lack of key. Should be fixed now (r117413). Regards, -- Daiki Ueno