From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9119: [PATCH] modernize function definitions in gmalloc.c Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:42:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4E24C5DC.50709@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334259781 10726 80.91.229.3 (12 Apr 2012 19:43:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9119@debbugs.gnu.org, Daniel Colascione To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 12 21:43:00 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SIPuu-00084q-R1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:42:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39200 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIPuu-00013B-9w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:42:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38408) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIPur-000134-UQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:42:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIPuq-00011n-2d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:42:49 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58282) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIPup-00011h-VY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:42:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SIPw1-0001yU-NK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:44:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9119 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 9119-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9119.13342598197555 (code B ref 9119); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9119) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2012 19:43:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54820 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SIPvf-0001xo-0U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:43:39 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:59582) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SIPvc-0001xf-MO for 9119@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:43:37 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SIPuK-0008Ht-5Y; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:42:16 +0200 X-Now-Playing: His Name Is Alive's _ECLIPX_: "The Ark The Light Your Eyes Inside" In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:04:50 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1SIPuK-0008Ht-5Y MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1334864536.4355@naLKYcv0obmsenG/4Sd/Qg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58932 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: >> IIRC, traditionally this file has been left alone as much as possible, >> so that it does not diverge from the glibc version (although it probably >> has). > > The contents of this file have been removed from glibc nearly 15 years > ago. So would it be OK to apply this patch, then? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/