From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9243: 24.0.50; Gnus keeps seeing 101 unread spam Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 07:25:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316237367 28608 80.91.229.12 (17 Sep 2011 05:29:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 05:29:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9243@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 17 07:29:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4nSr-0003dn-PF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 07:29:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45839 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4nSq-0003vA-Tx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:29:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33486) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4nSn-0003qm-D3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4nSm-0000ZA-5U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:29:17 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34851) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4nSm-0000Yy-3z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:29:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4nXO-00018L-La; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 05:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9243 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9243-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9243.13162376314330 (code B ref 9243); Sat, 17 Sep 2011 05:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9243) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2011 05:33:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4nXD-00017l-3s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:33:51 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4nX9-00017Z-FO for 9243@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:33:48 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R4nSP-0001Yy-Ax; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 07:28:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:42:38 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Now-Playing: Ikonika's _Contact, Love, Want, Have_: "Yoshimitsu" X-MailScanner-ID: 1R4nSP-0001Yy-Ax MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1316842133.43038@6qstvyX4Srs/SccI4Gn5nw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:34:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51252 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> (process-send-string (get-buffer-process (current-buffer)) >> "1 EXAMINE spam\r\n2 UID FETCH 46421:* FLAGS\r\n") > > `g' said 46421, so I ran exactly the above command, and the result was: > > * 12684 EXISTS > * 52 RECENT > * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1305554723] UID validity status > * OK [UIDNEXT 12685] Predicted next UID > * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen) > * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] Permanent flags > * OK [UNSEEN 11634] first unseen message in /export/home/mail3/monnier/Mail/spam > 1 OK [READ-ONLY] EXAMINE completed > * 12684 FETCH (UID 12684 FLAGS (\Recent)) > 2 OK UID FETCH completed That's really unexpected. The IMAP server claims that the highest message number is 12684, while Gnus thinks that the highest number is 46520 or something. Hm. Oh! Are your nnimap groups covered by the Agent? Or are there cache entries that may interfere here? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/