From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6691: 23.2; Eshell and ^M (PATCH attached) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:16:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334143028 21914 80.91.229.3 (11 Apr 2012 11:17:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6691@debbugs.gnu.org, John Wiegley To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 11 13:17:06 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHvXt-00071W-B4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:17:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46192 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHvXs-00081z-GZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:17:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44641) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHvXm-00081Z-Lm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHvXk-0000kt-6s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:16:58 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53894) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHvXk-0000ko-3i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:16:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHvYo-0003mM-9t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6691 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 6691-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6691.133414307114497 (code B ref 6691); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6691) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2012 11:17:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50431 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHvYc-0003ll-Lk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:17:50 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:42286) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHvYa-0003ld-En for 6691@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:17:49 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHvXP-0000Cf-IT; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:16:35 +0200 X-Now-Playing: Various's _Fuck Your Dreams, This Is Heaven_: "Minimal Compact - Still I'm Sad" In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:30:04 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1SHvXP-0000Cf-IT MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1334747795.88758@ftAm5ciyx1nHApUi+e73/w X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58767 Archived-At: Leo writes: > The problem is eshell-last-output-block-begin can point to a wrong > position in the eshell buffer after truncating buffer. I tried to trace > the reason of introducing eshell-last-output-block-begin but the > revision history only goes back to 2000. This looks like a good patch to me, but I don't use eshell, so I can't test. Does anybody know whether the `eshell-last-output-block-begin' stuff really is cruft that can be removed? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/