From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 02:19:10 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87r5356aqu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316909979 21562 80.91.229.12 (25 Sep 2011 00:19:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:19:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9591@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 25 02:19:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7cRS-0004yU-Ax for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 02:19:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55689 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7cRR-000192-HH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:19:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38378) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7cRN-00018l-Mg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:19:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7cRM-0007b0-Aq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:19:29 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7cRM-0007aw-7s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:19:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7cRu-0007VG-LV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9591 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9591-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9591.131691000028831 (code B ref 9591); Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9591) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2011 00:20:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7cRr-0007Uy-Lp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:19:59 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7cRo-0007Up-Kz for 9591@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:19:57 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R7cR8-0004Ig-G1; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 02:19:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:52:17 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEXn6Ol3gYhBRUoDAQMp KS3///8XFRgJBgmqdkMbAAACbElEQVQ4jXWUwW7bMAyGlQLerpXRbNeZENwHEDBdV0FQrk4A37tE oK9tHYivv5920qUrJiBGwE8/SZGUzPifZW7+Wmubz2BoZ+9r6pp/wMZNs9TkpvP2A9innYQa0+TD haxg6FmCRMqzF3lr/oIHxtYjuckLT/L8DvaORYraQ8Y/2V7BQ5pqSQnhS4ZIXi9gT5njasfHrxIF bc/RId1QEqJ7H+RlAQMx/CfYXRavK5wbBYe+EPUinPrVDslWwQPsiSUhir+CFwUpUs+c3GIPCnBI gH20jjVKvuz3MgVpzHiwLfPRxXxat/vAc+CtGe+sgzNKU2BmzbZOvuZnM9o2RWtp52FHyRZBya8K 0DnU9SejKpCoIAlA11mrGWm1Mk+LYOfPZuha2AE4oWTMlf05QWcG28KeOJToNEo6hZQRyOzVkTpJ eRKpJfsznXx1Zk/kQFzOXlw4Q3Ds5xAB4CKSo4w25JrSXGkXzvRo9ugOQA6VGe3NUpzIkU5mkGXN em4tc4Gzgi4oWEuHhKBEGnONLVczTvMKKg6CWLSrhR7laMbHC8BBbAvECZ2sT2b8fgMIziLFScov M369xBDuCM6S9r8QwEEWSahHqwd60iiR0KhhWiRSupY6ii3OlGiH1o69SiAAsA6fRLF/1Sn5MoEI IyfbdtpPcuv4HFh0OtEvix8So906cAPqXYkUwE4tsnpbhxq+ymoGwCGXq7NcA4wB2etqs9TmcnG+ we87yHN4fr9qUcPemw32O55VcLmcd9h5rwCDkeXHzXWGp/uN3WAuyP2+fQCUwB3pOZoPT8aeOpRQ P82nR0bnpFwfmeEPeIw3HYaEet4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Ford & Lopatin's _Emergency Room_: "Emergency Room (Gavin Russom Remix)" X-MailScanner-ID: 1R7cR8-0004Ig-G1 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1317514754.64626@qPufayB5zn9f99PCgREoyw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:20:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51805 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > Anyway, these buffers are supposed to be semi-hidden. > It isn't right for them to pop up due a completion > the user would not have expected. Yeah, they ought to be hidden better than they are now. Otherwise the distinction between "user buffers" and "hidden buffers" (i.e., the ones that have name starting with a space) gets pretty meaningless. But as a developer, I find that selecting the hidden buffers can be meaningful. I think it would be a great feature is the hidden buffers stay more hidden unless you request them, and if there was some kind of command you could give to make them visible if you really want them to. For instance, if you said `C-u C-x b', perhaps the hidden buffers would be visible? And if you didn't say `C-u', the hidden buffers would be totally hidden? That would go for the normal `C-x b' and the ido version, too. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/