From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thomas Fitzsimmons Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35969: 26.2, Excorporate Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 18:01:31 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="138586"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 35969@debbugs.gnu.org To: "tenspd137 ." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 30 00:02:47 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hW6ej-000ZwC-Tp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 May 2019 00:02:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33231 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hW6ei-0003Db-KK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:02:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47309) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hW6e8-0002sj-CA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:02:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hW6e5-0003Bu-C4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:02:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46662) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hW6e2-00039C-3S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hW6e1-0004A8-VG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Thomas Fitzsimmons Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 22:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35969 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35969-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35969.155916730215969 (code B ref 35969); Wed, 29 May 2019 22:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35969) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2019 22:01:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60204 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hW6dh-00049V-UK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:01:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it1-f176.google.com ([209.85.166.176]:40692) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hW6df-00049G-Lz for 35969@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:01:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it1-f176.google.com with SMTP id h11so6126274itf.5 for <35969@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 29 May 2019 15:01:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fitzsim-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=jnoHXAtqZC6X1mFqE3xTWWkuVv7LRSHOkrzZLEaCjpw=; b=bel/t0sFrsPlsTWdJ8uw9FlrDNZVDATpzHGZV9NYY8aqh1350ueZMMBN/eyHU0qx9f qYObPYmbyVFEwp8u25Wepif7PoWIoe6qAbLcrXDrzitWTcpHU2Uskph45b2lCIrM9Cn8 8houJD0Pf+lRx4bzNENb/FudaBNpd2yo5yRAe6McsZbIHMZNBlvFVbAoowqyNuti1z4D Gb1f9nUTEp6+dQUZ3gU97v2E05EiEChiDrBBuvFZKR+rtVw8G6eOGYIsAqeGoI+vPXpF NPWWgOEGZTxD6/LqQuEh577ZByNYtvIt+XRKrCzUem6aAvy8KruGO8tIT7vPVKKXFkFy 4o7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=jnoHXAtqZC6X1mFqE3xTWWkuVv7LRSHOkrzZLEaCjpw=; b=Sq0u3xRxAM2p7StZ7/0cr/r/ja3j0SHqnLyt4PH2p6lf5gMFCw7rQW0O3vM52KXBo9 yUtE286MaNtMraihwetr0mpInhVd1XwQIpK1eb9U7u7gDmeUFUKD7asrDA/J0ff4SXn9 TBRQp4tPxRZijj0UaM7EwGp/nDDyoP0Lw5c0qm5QoQeaNucqZpmA3IY8l7u6ZH+m3b4p zWq+B+cYvlnIRyx17Txj7GXh1yGsTP5tSbTzTtAbhexsDoJxTzr3yuNcowDWMfnSrPPl Iv2l+BlT4dAuK2SZ++RRPKuin+vk1Il0RlSOtSMij/P0gjUJ94dkhvp73AQ4QtOhuTWp ihxg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWIxPCZwEzviYWGdgJZ70DBfzz5TfTibPeYNDQtKwby+yooljlf FnTpY90nU0WlIudDO2o7RxItx0Ef900= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxo8/FrHxCjEPbznPshGeFDwZ5x/P/ljLJZ+EPmhPFAz50HOqyPd6QWQAzkYnbRJ0RPc7cxNg== X-Received: by 2002:a24:59c4:: with SMTP id p187mr392693itb.123.1559167293801; Wed, 29 May 2019 15:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (69-165-165-189.dsl.teksavvy.com. [69.165.165.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a11sm278934itc.42.2019.05.29.15.01.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 May 2019 15:01:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (tenspd's message of "Wed, 29 May 2019 15:44:25 -0600") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159898 Archived-At: Hi, "tenspd137 ." writes: > Sorry for questioning - but I don't think it is successful in the > basic authentication case - unless I am misreading some of the output. No problem; I quoted the "status=200" line which I think indicates that it was successful. But url creates another buffer and puts the authentication response in there; to be sure, you'd need to check that. I think for httpbin.org, it will contain the headers and then: { "authenticated": true, "user": "user" } just like your wget experiment. For your prior test run, the secondary buffer is mentioned in *URL-DEBUG* here: > retrieval -> Synchronous fetching done (#) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Can you redo the httpbin.org authentication test within Emacs, through the proxies, and paste the contents of that secondary/response buffer? It would be helpful if you could paste the redacted secondary/response buffer contents for the failed Exchange authentication too. > As for testing authentication against no proxy - yes, I can. In fact, > I actually have. It works. [...] OK, good to know, thanks. The use case makes sense. Thanks, Thomas