From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9121: Error in ispell process Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:06:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87vcuyuzc5.fsf@jidanni.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=shift_jis Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315711741 616 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2011 03:29:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9121@debbugs.gnu.org To: jidanni@jidanni.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 11 05:28:57 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2aj2-0006rc-NN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:28:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57788 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2aj2-0005R9-80 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:28:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60139) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2aiw-0005M4-SP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:28:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2aiv-0001x5-Qv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:28:50 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2aiv-0001x1-PR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:28:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2an0-0002sM-UW; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9121 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9121-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9121.131571194010969 (code B ref 9121); Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9121) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2011 03:32:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2amI-0002qi-UJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:32:20 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2amE-0002qC-Ud for 9121@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:32:15 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R2ai3-00080N-CV; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:27:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87vcuyuzc5.fsf@jidanni.org> (jidanni@jidanni.org's message of "Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:20:10 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Now-Playing: Fennesz's _Seven Stars_: "Shift" X-MailScanner-ID: 1R2ai3-00080N-CV MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1316316475.52196@+YI8TZA+RInaWPcO0Vp2vw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:33:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:50836 Archived-At: jidanni@jidanni.org writes: > I do ispell-word on a Chinese word by accident. > > Checking spelling of =91=E4=E0s=8C=D7=90=AB=95=CA... > Error in ispell process > > Well even if I don't have the right dictionaries installed, etc. it > should give a better error message. I first thought is was a charset issue, but apparently not. I've tried debugging this, but ispell really seems to give a blank output for this, so I think that "Error in ispell process" is actually correct. Anybody know what this would mean otherwise? --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/