From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8951: 24.0.50; [PATCH] enhancement request: buttonize key names Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:35:27 +0200 Message-ID: References: <375C29E7AB4048148D18B461FC1E02F1@us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="180964"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 'Stefan Monnier' , 8951@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 27 19:00:36 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXlE-000kwn-6J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 19:00:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52898 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXlD-0004FB-6E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:00:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50135) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXNU-0006FC-Qa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:36:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXNS-0003W8-Ro for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:36:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54114) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXNS-0003VV-JR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXNS-0002C9-Cm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8951 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 8951-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8951.15616533358376 (code B ref 8951); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8951) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2019 16:35:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39422 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXN0-0002B2-W7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:35:35 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:45222) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXMz-0002Au-EU for 8951@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:35:33 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXMt-0007fJ-Jf; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:35:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 8 Jul 2011 12:20:27 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:161617 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: >> >> > The Lisp version I wrote still invokes the original C >> >> > code for the \\{...} case. I did not try to rewrite >> >> > that in Lisp. >> >> >> >> I see. It should be pretty easy to do, easy exporting the needed >> >> underlying C function to Elisp, or rewriting it in Elisp >> >> (there's no good reason to have describe-buffer-bindings >> >> written in C, really). >> > >> > Please, go for it. I agree. >> >> Please send an updated patch so we can install it in the >> `pending' branch. > > Do you mean just redo what I did using the latest source code for the diff? I > would be glad to do that, if that's all you meant. Let me know. > > For the rest (migration from C, changing C code, etc.), someone else will need > to do it. I'm guessing that Stefan asked you to rewrite substitute-command-keys in Lisp. It makes sense to do that, I think, and it seems like a nice little project that somebody should undertake. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no