From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32683: 26.1.50; multi-occur-in-matching-buffers defaults could be improved Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 15:56:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ftyhtnm0.fsf@tromey.com> <87zhlizmlh.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87h87qzm6l.fsf@tromey.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="179790"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 32683@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tom Tromey Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 13 15:57:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hmIWS-000kZv-V7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 15:57:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55426 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmIWR-0007ly-3Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 09:57:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmIWN-0007ln-N7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 09:57:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hmIWM-0003RJ-IN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 09:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34143) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hmIWM-0003RB-Ex for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 09:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmIWM-0003ew-7y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 09:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 13:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32683 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 32683-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32683.156302619714035 (code B ref 32683); Sat, 13 Jul 2019 13:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32683) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2019 13:56:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42964 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmIVx-0003eJ-Ff for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 09:56:37 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:34250) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmIVu-0003eD-9F for 32683@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 09:56:36 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hmIVq-00019T-5j; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 15:56:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87h87qzm6l.fsf@tromey.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Fri, 12 Jul 2019 20:46:10 -0600") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:162880 Archived-At: Tom Tromey writes: > Lars> It would, but I don't think this is possible at this date -- the command > Lars> in question is at least a decade old. So I'm closing this bug report. > > How about adding a new command that works better? My feeling is that rgrep has us pretty much covered -- this occur command isn't really that vital... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no