From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9243: 24.0.50; Gnus keeps seeing 101 unread spam Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 04:44:39 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325907913 25912 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2012 03:45:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 03:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9243@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 07 04:45:09 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RjNDQ-0001Ns-PI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 04:45:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51188 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjNDQ-0003xX-Ax for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:45:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42904) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjNDM-0003ve-97 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:45:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjNDL-0000e0-4v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:45:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52737) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjNDL-0000ds-1t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:45:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RjNDK-0000lK-30; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:45:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9243 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9243-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9243.13259078912901 (code B ref 9243); Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9243) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2012 03:44:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47409 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RjND7-0000kj-OE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:44:50 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:44193) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RjND4-0000kb-Pc for 9243@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:44:47 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RjNCy-0001Pj-DH; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 04:44:40 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEVBTFw4RFNNVWSOlaAy NkIkJi8NWn0KAAACeklEQVQ4ja1TS47lIAw0Fm8PiOyNQ+9bry8QMmafRHD/q0wx6t18VoMSlMh2 UVU2FH9fbm30h0D8VyDQd7H7reLrL+t/BnTt+/e7lr7xIuAiqxjvn4+W+KiSayr+2ImdJcosx3YI ISmyeI1IMNUy2ELioGttj6Zde6LXkIYsIpdUoh6lMcL1pou2+agLgXxAyLMyLRDAlmmnZBdICeBl FSQlGiaxOyWm5EPJ6b01fqOO6lSV4FujoDiG8JP3t6sU8+VitlTufqq3oO+P+bw10zYiBKZ8FhSI yyDVB0AohuAalLTkzmaRX2MvM30JZZuWWHo4/KHlJOWnWj+/SNgFlOfBDhC1wbH9c86H+lVi5iQ4 NYexekwQqJ20QHCf0dlw1ha+ioOB0DGbQdm4WCLSYgtQ7wQusD21j1TE+hHfZRu3gjlRFAbWaKhO GY5bwhElU57DTZVsUFUHi81TUlwWO9ezS/4qyIyGBhRweXR187Zz9Wi7gM1UL/UD7oq+7uKCt0ty kjmSenRRK6mfC13DK0hPkCETRsD/pS3ffVioI4NafhaFodRIttP/6ucLhLherh/af9BdW06aLQiy GYzhSXF9UmBifxazNqMAymy5DxP7gTG51qjVEWPjnjBTZU0iRrfPRL6fAOttWT5O3Ql88D3NMrF+ TBgoHQCVbnfACjHK4NInNjXMu1KJZuixZhETsN76o8zrjGmwoSJ3haXbcSplXOfJvaU1fqxOZcB9 OUbgQTrygM/zrJpxAsz3LWrGzZpG6JXWQ+cEdy3ecKGU7iaSSnLzYFhj+caInrElZLMUWB9Xtr5G bF9lA1Fq8Gba4jStD+jNGHo8PwFhzaukIiiSlAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Fennesz, Sakamoto's _Flumina (1)_: "0318" In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 07 Jan 2012 04:31:53 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1RjNCy-0001Pj-DH MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1326512680.61474@mtBrUT0p5JCvXhEJjRBgVQ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55466 Archived-At: `gnus-agent-synchronize-flags' has defaulted to nil since 2005, but that means that marks that have been set while Gnus is offline won't propagate to the server automatically. The comment is ;; If the default switches to something else than nil, then the function ;; should be fixed not be exceedingly slow. See 2005-09-20 ChangeLog entry. but I tried it just now, and it isn't particularly slow. If no marks have been set, then it doesn't do anything much. I think the issue was that nntp (for some reason or other) had gotten backend marks switched on by default, which made things just slow beyond belief. But now that's not the case, so I think this should default to t. Anybody have any thoughts on this? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/