From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: joakim@verona.se Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7955: patch for imagemagick header rename Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:37:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87mxm0x4h8.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297717670 20326 80.91.229.12 (14 Feb 2011 21:07:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7955@debbugs.gnu.org, Chong Yidong To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 14 22:07:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp5e5-0006AT-Sc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:07:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40514 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pp5e5-0002aq-6l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:07:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43166 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pp5cq-0001xw-7s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:06:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp5cp-0002oL-1j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:06:28 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp5co-0002oG-V8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:06:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp52c-0007Gp-5U; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: joakim@verona.se Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7955 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7955-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7955.129771529727896 (code B ref 7955); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7955) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2011 20:28:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp51s-0007Ft-Cv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:28:16 -0500 Original-Received: from iwfs.imcode.com ([82.115.149.64] helo=gate.verona.se) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp51q-0007Fg-M9 for 7955@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:28:15 -0500 Original-Received: from chopper (IDENT:1005@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gate.verona.se (8.13.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id p1EKbBdS014084; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:37:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:13:15 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:29:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44126 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > joakim@verona.se wrote: > >> I managed to push to the imagemagick branch. > > Why are you still using that branch? I thought it was suitable to work on a branch since I find the autoconf machinery to be brittle and I'm not even able to test the patch properly atm. The branch has been updated from trunk so I thought it was ok. Why is it a concern? -- Joakim Verona