From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24201: 25.1.50; TLS connections sometimes hang Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 20:06:46 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83mvicebin.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1j8e9c0.fsf@gnu.org> <83shg5z32d.fsf@gnu.org> <87efrp2qw0.fsf@mouse> <83tw0lxjt3.fsf@gnu.org> <6e9f3b6c-43df-bf95-d346-56c93c61b4d7@cs.ucla.edu> <83o9kk96ez.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1519067114 31441 195.159.176.226 (19 Feb 2018 19:05:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 19:05:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 24201@debbugs.gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 19 20:05:09 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enqkK-0007WK-Af for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 20:05:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51904 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enqmK-0000qm-SO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 14:07:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55604) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enqmF-0000qH-F5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 14:07:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enqmE-0006Lp-Ch for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 14:07:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43747) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enqmE-0006Li-82 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 14:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enqmE-0007hw-1i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 14:07:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 19:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24201 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24201-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24201.151906721929613 (code B ref 24201); Mon, 19 Feb 2018 19:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24201) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2018 19:06:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51643 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enqmB-0007hZ-1U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 14:06:59 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:42076) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enqm8-0007hQ-Jz for 24201@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 14:06:58 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.209.240.67.getinternet.no ([84.209.240.67] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enqly-0004Qn-HA; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 20:06:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83o9kk96ez.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 19 Feb 2018 20:32:36 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:143476 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> It's using 100% CPU, so it's busy-waiting, but every time I stop it, >> it's in that pthread_sigmask, as far as I'm able to tell... > > And if you then say "continue" or "finish", does it exit from the > pthread_sigmask call? If not, some other thread is spinning. Hm... actually, I don't know. I say "cont" and then break it again, and it says that it's in a pthread_sigmask call, but I don't know whether it's the same one... The process has unfortunately exited now, but the next time this happens, what's the best way to debug what's going on? I'm not very well versed in gdb usage. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no