From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26550: [PATCH] Fix js.el filling inline JSDoc tags Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:44:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="155745"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 26550@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Etienne Prud'homme" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 24 18:45:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hfS5g-000eNK-2m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:45:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53102 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfS5e-0004Bt-Sy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:45:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36018) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfS5X-0004Bh-S2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:45:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hfS5W-00044u-SM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44263) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hfS5W-000445-Oe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfS5W-0000re-Ic for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26550 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 26550-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26550.15613946653252 (code B ref 26550); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26550) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2019 16:44:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57804 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfS4u-0000qO-W7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:44:25 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:33350) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfS4q-0000qA-Gq for 26550@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:44:20 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hfS4m-0005Q3-3d; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:44:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Etienne Prud'homme's message of "Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:18:11 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:161248 Archived-At: "Etienne Prud'homme" writes: > However, the link tag can be broken arbitrary and would make the tag harder > to read (without considering font-lock that is implemented in an other > package). > >> /** >> * @foo >> * Description. Link to other symbol {@link >> * document.body.style} >> * @bar > > I searched the JSDoc documentation[1] about line breaks inside an inline > tags and didn't find explicit information about whether or not it was valid. > Given that inline litterally means on one line, I guess we can pretend the > specification doesn't allow line breaks inside an inline tag. [...] > After checking the code, it seems that having a newline inside the inline tag > is valid [1]. Given this, the proposed change may not be the right one, so I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no