From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chang Xiaoduan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67900: 30.0.50; Emacs Crahes When Executing Command `consult-buffer' Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:24:52 +0800 Message-ID: References: <838r5qib7l.fsf@gnu.org> <83plz1ggua.fsf@gnu.org> <8334vwgezh.fsf@gnu.org> <83msu2fzvc.fsf@gnu.org> <834jg9fk2j.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37902"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 67900@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 02 08:26:22 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rKZAL-0009br-GS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 08:26:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rKZA5-0007qx-01; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 02:26:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rKZA0-0007pZ-Er for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 02:26:00 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rKZA0-0004bD-6o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 02:26:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rKZA2-0006WF-Ag for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 02:26:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chang Xiaoduan Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 07:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67900 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 67900-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67900.170418031124993 (code B ref 67900); Tue, 02 Jan 2024 07:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67900) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2024 07:25:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49251 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rKZ9D-0006V3-7i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 02:25:11 -0500 Original-Received: from r3-20.sinamail.sina.com.cn ([202.108.3.20]:45926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rKZ9A-0006Um-S2 for 67900@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 02:25:09 -0500 X-SMAIL-HELO: PWRD-20210716KV Original-Received: from unknown (HELO PWRD-20210716KV)([111.207.225.84]) by sina.com (10.182.253.24) with ESMTP id 6593BA43000038F2; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 15:24:59 +0800 (CST) X-Sender: drcxd@sina.com X-Auth-ID: drcxd@sina.com Authentication-Results: sina.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=drcxd@sina.com; dkim=none header.i=none; dmarc=none action=none header.from=drcxd@sina.com X-SMAIL-MID: 4490851048685 X-SMAIL-UIID: D3F5298604334FB7B58E9BD9A2306739-20240102-152459-1 In-Reply-To: (Andrea Corallo's message of "Fri, 29 Dec 2023 13:37:23 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:277217 Archived-At: Andrea Corallo writes: > > There could be some function generated by macros without the speed > declaration? Dunno... > > Anyway please try the opposite strategy (CU at speed 2 and functions at > speed 1) to narrow the function and let us know if it's more successful. > > Thanks > > Andrea Hello, I just confirmed that when Emacs is built with `native-comp-speed' set to 2 and only `consult-buffer' has the form `(declare (speed 1))`, I can still reproduce the crash. However, when all `defun', `defmacro', `cl-defun' and `defsubst' get the form `(declare (speed 1))`, then the crash can not be reproduced. Before I investigate further, I am wondering that is that only one function responsible to the crash? Is it possible that when 2 or more certain functions get compiled with `native-comp-speed' set to 2 that the crash can be reproduced? If this is ture, then I think mannually add declare forms to functions is some how impossible to find the combination of such functions. Thanks