From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21953: Eliminate warnings in the emacs-25 release branch Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:04:15 -0800 Message-ID: References: <081tbn5g02.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83d1v79mfz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448317117 8109 80.91.229.3 (23 Nov 2015 22:18:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:18:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21953@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 23 23:18:25 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a0zRF-0005L9-UY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 23:18:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34950 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0zRG-00020x-Ly for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:18:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48499) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0zR1-0001hH-Pp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:18:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0zQx-00051i-7B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:18:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60290) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0zQx-00051d-3J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:18:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a0zQw-0003DC-Oi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:18:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: John Wiegley Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21953 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21953.144831705412268 (code B ref 21953); Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Nov 2015 22:17:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49993 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a0zQU-0003Bm-4v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:17:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]:35760) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a0zQQ-0003BM-B5 for 21953@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:17:30 -0500 Original-Received: by pacej9 with SMTP id ej9so204045179pac.2 for <21953@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:17:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=JvCuRxmvTi+KOIWiLfWgJX4dyZYl0YFHf5rZPmTK9Qw=; b=F/I8R81ToGBVr1WafyuGLCXMMwvAAAEEcQFhzBew37rSS1E7BCgNmgOW4r6f+Q6ziq /4pN9RLdAwp2k+Xo0ZIgWAN4kOvAa2pVIps/aE+DmNnqbN7gJsl7zscQ+w0PfD9kuj4r FiVoe1xmvOLTdEEHKbXZlDLnCMNbcgPNC4AHqHn3sonHVXPX54Knsrd4TvhBn6qALDzB GswQdW9SnZftk9LJCMLEpbfDU4R5FX1bh2SpsJGd4U2bYm/bCaHEHaXj3paBYGC3lIHH tpbpoCj4wJufvzEMCMcndDQYWax9EMNW80P3+HE/TvLK70/J0JDOn4hXumIxRjh0THvz Ec9w== X-Received: by 10.66.158.169 with SMTP id wv9mr21856493pab.138.1448317049599; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:17:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y87sm11205984pfi.84.2015.11.23.14.17.26 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:17:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id B4BA710ABDF31; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:17:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:10:59 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109160 Archived-At: >>>>> Glenn Morris writes: > In any case, .elc files are pre-built in release tarfiles, so people > building releases don't even see these warnings. So making it a release goal > doesn't make sense to me. You know, that's a really good point. Perhaps this then: Development goal to reduce warnings as much as is feasible. Long-term development goal to eliminate them. Release is not block either way. How does that sound, Eli, if Drew is right about users not seeing the warnings? John