From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14595: Erroneous composition of lambda in emacs-lisp buffers with prog-prettify-symbols enabled Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:27:50 -0400 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: References: <83fvwjvje3.fsf@gnu.org> <83zjuqu5ud.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371375069 22446 80.91.229.3 (16 Jun 2013 09:31:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 09:31:09 +0000 (UTC) To: 14595@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 16 11:31:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo9Ig-0001CE-Vp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:31:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54734 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo9Ig-0000SS-Gl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:31:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51597) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo9Id-0000SC-7G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:31:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo9Ic-0007Zz-Ej for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53327) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo9Ic-0007Zu-C2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo9Ic-0006ty-2t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 09:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14595 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.137137502526425 (code B ref -1); Sun, 16 Jun 2013 09:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2013 09:30:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47641 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo9Hz-0006s8-T3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:30:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49737) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo9Hu-0006rc-KA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:30:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo9Ho-0007UY-Bf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:30:13 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:54054) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo9Ho-0007UT-9W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:30:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51448) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo9Hn-0000Py-BI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:30:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo9Hl-0007U2-S1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:56666) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo9Hl-0007Tj-Mh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo9Hg-0008Pv-7T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:30:04 +0200 Original-Received: from 11.79-161-196.customer.lyse.net ([79.161.196.11]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:30:04 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 11.79-161-196.customer.lyse.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:30:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 11.79-161-196.customer.lyse.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:EJ+utWNli2CjsrXaQA5aRn/qoTU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:75200 Archived-At: On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:01:48 +0200 Juanma Barranquero wrote: JB> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> I wasn't aware of any inconsistent display or scrolling behavior in >> his description. Juanma, can you repeat that description, which I >> probably missed? JB> With a file containing 1000 identical lines "(lambda (x) x)", the JB> lambdas that were incorrectly composed depend on the direction you JB> scroll the buffer. Scrolling from the beginning towards the end (page JB> by page), I got about 30 errors, always in the same positions JB> (distributed non-uniformly). If you repeat the experiment, but go JB> immediately to the end and scroll up, you got a different number of JB> errors (double or so) at different possitions, also consistents from JB> one run to the next. JB> I suppose that's what Ted is talking about. Yes. Again, I don't know if this is a problem worth fixing, I was just clarifying how it's inconsistent depending on the scroll direction. Ted