From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Filipp Gunbin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27544: 25.1; Visualization of Unicode bidirectional marks Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:14:03 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87sfvcapqd.fsf@gnus.org> <2C04D747-6772-4283-8455-39FEE767F61F@gnu.org> <87fsrc8goq.fsf@gnus.org> <8335ncs0z6.fsf@gnu.org> <87bl20jkg7.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnkoqki5.fsf@gnu.org> <865ys7o0q0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27305"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (darwin) Cc: 27544@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen , itai.berli@gmail.com To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 15 19:53:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mxZOw-0006yI-RH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:53:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40040 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxZOv-0002FL-QC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:53:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxYnu-0002V7-20 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50346) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxYnt-0002Fr-Mt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:15:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxYnt-0005A4-JU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:15:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Filipp Gunbin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:15:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27544 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 27544-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27544.163959205619767 (code B ref 27544); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:15:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27544) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2021 18:14:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33659 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxYnA-00058l-Ly for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:14:16 -0500 Original-Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]:45315) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxYn8-00058W-6R for 27544@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:14:14 -0500 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8383200681; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:14:07 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:14:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm1; bh=XRw6plGVKoyp7E9P51V0ac27bT 14zk+pQhlN915ACRk=; b=alzw2k7z5OtVPM52qffzDpsUTHHyCUjqi3BlQ02kWZ eWPTC0B4KANHUvpyZ9HNanKEfSePv0fSYpAEBtTqB6rCshweUwxpFC3kfkXmM5yC /XPtdaY1BUnnOW+EMV+gXvSiHWUwvowILelVl6UToKMO+vgWIhvngBdybiHOMftv DJ1VNVED/rRw7xDjw/rPyas8oV+MPoVcFawzX5mTL6KMcha6xnGur9DrWAc8nCxt 7joNnF8J/SVitxwML/g4Mwe8CsJM6w2KnwLjwrHuBDgO5z7Yo+o4qt8bEKD4G4xC VyvZ5qapG222JIe3kV+NCxUqrjnRUIoKiZqg5hRv8kVQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=XRw6pl GVKoyp7E9P51V0ac27bT14zk+pQhlN915ACRk=; b=llJqvLGWE4YkvCKEaUwBR5 Sw5hOfakt3eY7FPFC/UdiUBsgxmQSuS9kfBvYt39AjxkjreZ8mePyforSVM3E207 /oKYcOg2frZzSajj2wnenzuvTZehxoGtW6ZE0PMkI3h1B3CRCC0h4VgGqAAPxRRk Sarjr9XcdazGWhWulS0epQVzvdemHZWNQGtBvyaM1Az7Zd+OZG9UWQHyLqTYtNqt 249n4VuvC+EBtOs2kRwDeFnRqBt2EvVYwbkRF02j95RycDt4cGEBk+pola1JxqqY MgaLofyR+NYlSTXeGfowmmqlReF8dwz3RsmVrTyW15DSGSW2joMySkbyfhQf1EbA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrledvgdduuddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfhgffffkgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefhihhlihhp phcuifhunhgsihhnuceofhhguhhnsghinhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmheqnecuggftrf grthhtvghrnhepvdevkeffvdeuvefhuddtjeehkedvueefveettddtveduudfgieffieev ieevhfdtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomh epfhhguhhnsghinhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:14:05 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <865ys7o0q0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Thu, 02 Dec 2021 11:04:07 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:222433 Archived-At: On 02/12/2021 11:04 +0200, Juri Linkov wrote: >>> > Thanks. But wouldn't glyphless-hex-display-mode be a better name? >>> > glyphless-display-mode doesn't really say what it does to glyphless >>> > characters. >>> >>> It doesn't hexify the glyphs, it uses `acronym'. But I thought we might >>> allow that to be customised if somebody asks for it, which is why it's >>> not called `glyphless-acronym-display-mode'. >> >> But glyphless-display-mode has no mnemonic value. We already display >> glyphless characters, so this name doesn't help at all. >> >> Does anyone have suggestions for a better name? > > "glyphless-display-mode" looks fine - I read it as to mean > a mode that defines how to display glyphless chars. > It could also provide a defcustom with a choice from > glyphless-char-display-method. Maybe glyphless-char-display-mode? I'm sure that was considered, and dropped, but glyphless-display-mode is just too broad... Is it a mode with no glyphs displayed?