From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29416: 26.0.90: display glitch Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:07:18 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1511467637 32761 195.159.176.226 (23 Nov 2017 20:07:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 20:07:17 +0000 (UTC) To: 29416@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 23 21:07:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxm9-0007r2-VS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:07:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45902 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxmE-0003je-4k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:07:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54553) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxm7-0003jN-SA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:07:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxm3-00073n-1r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:07:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45492) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxm2-00073D-UL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxm2-0007uz-MU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:07:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 20:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 29416 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.151146759130400 (code B ref -1); Thu, 23 Nov 2017 20:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Nov 2017 20:06:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54173 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxlX-0007uF-Ht for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:06:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34572) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxlV-0007u2-NJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:06:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxlP-0006A4-US for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:06:24 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:54013) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxlP-00069k-Rf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:06:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53742) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxlO-0003hJ-Q8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:06:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxlK-0005yh-0F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:06:22 -0500 Original-Received: from sinyavsky.aurox.ch ([37.35.109.145]:57166) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHxlJ-0005kl-OB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:06:17 -0500 Original-Received: from sinyavsky.aurox.ch (sinyavsky.aurox.ch [127.0.0.1]) by sinyavsky.aurox.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4112B225CF for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 19:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: sinyavsky.aurox.ch (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=aurox.ch DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=aurox.ch; h= subject:subject:to:from:from:message-id:date:date; s=dkim; t= 1511467131; x=1512331132; bh=j7x/cHhlTJ1SbtkKMhseC8/siK5r1IvVx4M 16NiMRaI=; b=rhDFGQ951XvUK9AHw2OiLoZI0e/csygg1YQ8nNMKSIEjQ1vVitn ulRsmiqsORo8mwiuw8AnodRG0HUY1owhWyn3DUz8dvh8mgnzxUDaEffVJ8z0o4Z4 rAj/ZMmDCBzACj8KZ71aZ6KepDaGUZ0leZkInLfFYphL8R+GNLTv7Fxc= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at test.virtualizor.com Original-Received: from sinyavsky.aurox.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by sinyavsky.aurox.ch (sinyavsky.aurox.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id GMWUgl1UjF_A for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 19:58:51 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from gray (125.85.192.178.dynamic.wline.res.cust.swisscom.ch [178.192.85.125]) by sinyavsky.aurox.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5B4F225BC for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 19:58:51 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:140271 Archived-At: Using Ubuntu GNU/Linux and launching emacs -q on the pretest: M-x find-function RET format-message RET M-x load-theme RET wombat RET C-5 C-v C-5 C-v There are a few horizontal blue lines visible on the last line of: > { > return styled_format (nargs, args, true); > } so that it looks a little like this instead: > } ___ _ ____ __ This was the only easily reproducible case I could come up with, but I've seen the problem elsewhere several times in daily use with 26.0.90. In contrast I never saw anything similar occur in 25.3.