From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Gemini Lasswell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24940: [PATCH] Add should-call, should-not-call, and their tests Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 22:12:52 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87inrqxcfl.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479190469 6974 195.159.176.226 (15 Nov 2016 06:14:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 06:14:29 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (darwin) Cc: 24940@debbugs.gnu.org To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 15 07:14:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6X0W-0008LX-JC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 07:14:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44424 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6X0Z-0007ll-G9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 01:14:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38300) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6X0R-0007l3-Pk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 01:14:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6X0M-0007xa-RQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 01:14:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42237) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6X0M-0007x1-O6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 01:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6X0M-0001Mz-G9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 01:14:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gemini Lasswell Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 06:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24940 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 24940-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24940.14791903835173 (code B ref 24940); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 06:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24940) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2016 06:13:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57636 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6WzO-0001LN-Tq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 01:13:03 -0500 Original-Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:43023) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6WzM-0001Kw-Ii for 24940@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 01:13:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com) by bars.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6WzL-0003Jl-AI; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 07:12:59 +0100 Original-Received: from [207.118.9.65] (helo=rainbow.local) by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:179284 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1c6WzH-000176-GM; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 07:12:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87inrqxcfl.fsf@russet.org.uk> (Phillip Lord's message of "Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:18:22 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:125709 Archived-At: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) writes: > That's interesting. I'm probably going to add my own package, assess, to > ELPA soon, and then to core, which has some similar functionality. > > https://github.com/phillord/assess > > Out of curiosity, would assess have fulfilled your use case also? Yes it would have.