From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14595: Erroneous composition of lambda in emacs-lisp buffers with prog-prettify-symbols enabled Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:21:44 -0400 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: References: Reply-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371285068 5092 80.91.229.3 (15 Jun 2013 08:31:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 08:31:08 +0000 (UTC) To: 14595@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 15 10:31:08 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Unlt5-0008Kx-Pm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:31:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38027 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Unlt5-0007h5-B3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:31:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42459) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Unlt1-0007gk-Fx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:31:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Unlt0-00054s-8F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Unlt0-00054o-4r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Unlsz-0006T1-QE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:31:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 08:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14595 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.137128502124685 (code B ref -1); Sat, 15 Jun 2013 08:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jun 2013 08:30:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45581 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UnlsK-0006Q4-VW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:30:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40656) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UnlsI-0006PZ-A3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:30:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UnlsB-00050Z-O5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:30:12 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:37347) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UnlsB-00050T-Jn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UnlsA-0007ec-Do for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Unls9-0004z3-4m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:30:10 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:56986) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Unls8-0004yv-Uc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Unls4-0007hO-Mj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:30:04 +0200 Original-Received: from 11.79-161-196.customer.lyse.net ([79.161.196.11]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:30:04 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 11.79-161-196.customer.lyse.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:30:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 11.79-161-196.customer.lyse.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:f/F3K+APbd/Ei6SjegWW4wx9PDA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:75142 Archived-At: On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 05:18:59 +0200 Juanma Barranquero wrote: JB> If I visit lambda.el as in the example above, and scroll down the JB> buffer, I get 26 such failures, always at the same lines (168, 280, JB> 364, 432, 489, 538, 581, 619, 654, 686, 715, 742, 767, 791, 813, 834, JB> 854, 873, 891, 908, 924, 940, 955, 970, 984 and 998); however, if upon JB> visiting the file I go to the end of the buffer and scroll up, I get JB> many more failures (about 60) at diferent lines, but also consistently JB> the same lines. Ouch. I don't think I'm doing anything strange in the fontification keywords that implement the new prettification functionality, but why wasn't this seen before? The scroll behavior probably indicates a display engine issue. Ted