From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Helmut Eller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16854: 24.3.50; ert-run-tests-interactively t selector not working Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:16:09 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87mwhhkao3.fsf@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393179441 21586 80.91.229.3 (23 Feb 2014 18:17:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:17:21 +0000 (UTC) To: 16854@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 23 19:17:28 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WHdcF-00074J-3I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:17:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53861 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHdcE-0003hc-Kd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:17:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34701) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHdc2-0003fP-Md for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:17:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHdbq-0005lP-K2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:17:14 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35607) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHdbq-0005lL-Gh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WHdbp-0004ev-PW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Helmut Eller Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16854 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.139317941617894 (code B ref -1); Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2014 18:16:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36789 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WHdbj-0004eY-Ie for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:16:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:32901) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WHdbh-0004eL-CG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:16:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHdbS-0005hg-HW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:16:47 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:49677) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHdbS-0005hc-Cz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:16:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34558) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHdbK-0003E9-Ob for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:16:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHdbD-0005cp-Ea for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:16:30 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54671) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHdbD-0005cl-8c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:16:23 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WHdbC-0006dQ-0j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:16:22 +0100 Original-Received: from dial-187038.pool.broadband44.net ([212.46.187.38]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:16:22 +0100 Original-Received: from eller.helmut by dial-187038.pool.broadband44.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:16:22 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 31 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-187038.pool.broadband44.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:fssDym4Ey6hujzUBRHazU4krFAw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86078 Archived-At: On Sun, Feb 23 2014, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > Helmut Eller writes: > >> When I run this >> >> (require 'ert) >> (ert-deftest infloop0 () (while t)) >> >> with: emacs -Q -nw -l infloops.el -f ert >> >> Emacs starts up and asks: "Run tests (default t): " >> If I enter: "t RET" >> then ERT does not run anything and simply writes: >> "Ran 0 tests, 0 results were as expected" >> >> The expected result is that all tests should be executed. > > Same here. Apparently, this is fallout from 114803 (bug#9756). > > The code before it used `read-from-minibuffer' with t READ argument, so > "t" was converted to `t'. But now `ert-select-tests' receives SELECTOR > as "t". > > The patch below fixes it for me. Yes, with the patch t works. But it's no longer possible to enter regexps. Not sure if that matters. Maybe the default should be the regexp ".*" instead of t. Hmm, that would look odd. Helmut